Defending Substitution is part of the Acadia Studies in Bible and Theology series. Series editors are Craig A. Evans and Lee Martin McDonald.  
  
"The meaning of Jesus's death remains controversial. In this short exploratory study Simon Gathercole draws on a range of classical as well as biblical sources to argue that for Paul, at least, the notion of substitution remained central. Many questions remain, but this book will give new energy to the ongoing discussion."  
--__N. T. Wright__, University of St. Andrews  
  
"Why is Good Friday good? According to one classic answer to this question, Jesus's shameful and violent death belongs to the good news of the gospel because he died in our place. By careful and lucid analysis of key passages, Simon Gathercole shows that this view has deep roots both in Paul's texts and in his Jewish and Greco-Roman cultural heritage. Often criticized and caricatured, the concept of substitution is integral to the New Testament's conviction that Christ died 'for us' and 'for our sins.'"  
--__Francis Watson__, Durham University  
  
"In this little book, Simon Gathercole carefully and convincingly dismisses false dichotomies. The death of Christ is presented in the Bible as both representative and substitutionary. These learned and lucid lectures use the prism of modern disputes to take us to the heart of Pauline teaching on the cross. I highly commend it."  
--__Mark Dever__, pastor, Capitol Hill Baptist Church, Washington, DC  
  
"Can Christ's work of atonement be substitutionary in nature? Though Reformation Protestantism has replied in the affirmative, much recent scholarship has tended to have a negative view of this atonement motif. Simon Gathercole is to be congratulated for intervening in this debate with a short, clear, and lively book that argues the case for a substitutionary motif from a biblical perspective, and with an eye to both the Christian tradition and recent debates in the literature. This is a work all those interested in the atonement will want to read and engage. It is certainly a book I shall be recommending to my students."  
--__Oliver D. Crisp__, Fuller Theological Seminary

__Simon Gathercole__ (PhD, University of Durham) is senior lecturer in New Testament studies in the Faculty of Divinity of the University of Cambridge and Fellow and director of studies in theology at Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, England. A leading British New Testament scholar, he has written several groundbreaking books.

In recent decades, the church and academy have witnessed intense debates concerning the concept of penal substitution to describe Christ's atoning sacrifice. Some claim it promotes violence, glorifies suffering and death, and amounts to divine child abuse. Others argue it plays a pivotal role in classical Christian doctrine. Here world-renowned New Testament scholar Simon Gathercole offers an exegetical and historical defense of the traditional substitutionary view of the atonement. He provides critical analyses of various interpretations of the atonement and places New Testament teaching in its Old Testament and Greco-Roman contexts, demonstrating that the interpretation of atonement in the Pauline corpus must include substitution.

A world-renowned New Testament scholar offers an exegetical and historical defense of the classical substitutionary view of the atonement.

__Introduction__  The Importance of Substitution  
 Defining Substitution: Christ in Our Place  
 Criticisms of Substitution  
__1. Exegetical Challenges to Substitution__  The Tübingen Understanding of Representative "Place-Taking"  
 Interchange in Christ  
 Apocalyptic Deliverance  
 The Omission or Downplaying of "Sins"  
 Conclusion  
__2. "Christ Died for Our Sins according to the Scriptures" (1 Cor. 15:3)__  The Importance of 1 Corinthians 15:3-4  
 "According to the Scriptures"  
 Substitution in 1 Corinthians 15:3  
 Conclusion  
 Excursus: An Objection--Why, Then, Do Christians Still Die?  
__3. The Vicarious Death of Christ and Classical Parallels (Rom. 5:6-8)__  The Translation of Romans 5:6-8  
 A Sketch of the Exegesis  
 Vicarious Deaths in Classical Tradition  
 The Comparison in Romans 5:6-8  
 Conclusion  
__Conclusion  
Indexes__

\["For Christians seeking a deeper understanding of atonement", "Clarifies misconceptions surrounding penal substitution", "You will gain insights into traditional Christian doctrine"\]

Defending Substitution offers a thorough defence of penal substitution in Christ's atonement.

Gathercole, Simon

Cover

Series Page

Title Page

Copyright Page

Endorsements

Dedication

Preface

Abbreviations

Introduction

1. Exegetical Challenges to Substitution

2. “Christ Died for Our Sins according to the Scriptures” (1 Cor. 15:3)

Excursus: An Objection—Why, Then, Do Christians Still Die?

3. The Vicarious Death of Christ and Classical Parallels (Rom. 5:6–8)

Conclusion

Bibliography

Index of Subjects

Index of Authors

Index of Scripture and Other Ancient Sources

Back Cover

A scholarly essay by Simon Gathercole examining the classical substitutionary view of atonement in Paul's writings. Ideal for theology students and scholars.

\["For scholars and Christians exploring atonement theories", "Clarifies the substitutionary view of the atonement", "You will strengthen your understanding of biblical doctrine"\]

This insightful essay defends the classical view of atonement in Paul's teachings.

Defending Substitution (Acadia Studies in Bible and Theology) [eBook]

Navigation Bar

Header Default

Download the Christian360 App to read eBooks and listen to Audiobooks bought at Christian360

Defending Substitution (Acadia Studies in Bible and Theology) [eBook]

Description

Need support?

Customer reviews

Download the App

Download the App